derf
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:25 am Post subject: Re: Fedora 9 - how to replace gdm with kdm |
 |
|
Jim Cochrane wrote:
| Quote: | It took me some time googling to find out how to do this on F9, so I
thought I'd share it - how to configure the system to use kdm as the
display manager instead of gdm - in case it saves time for someone else.
In Fedora 9 there appears to be no GUI-based way of configuring this
(e.g., via 'System Settings'). Nevertheless, it is pretty easy.
You do need to become root to do it (e.g., 'sudo su').
The script:
/etc/X11/prefdm
is run at startup time; it looks for /etc/sysconfig/desktop and if
it exists, 'sources' it. It then checks to see if the DISPLAYMANAGER
variable is set and, if so, uses its value to try to determine which
display manager to use (expecting it to be one of: GNOME, KDE, WDM,
XDM). If this variable is not set, it tries to execute, in this order:
gdm
kdm
wdm
xdm
So the first of these that runs successfully is the one that will be
used, if the DISPLAYMANAGER variable is not set.
On my system /etc/sysconfig/desktop did not exist, so prefdm was
executing gdm. The solution, of course, is to create
/etc/sysconfig/desktop and simply put this line in it:
DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE
If the file exists, of course, just make sure DISPLAYMANAGER is set as
above.
(Reference:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/2002-September/msg00028.html
)
Note: I used this solution to solve another irritating problem: gdm on
F9 always defaults to gnome - you have to explicitly tell it to use kde
each time if you're a KDE user.
--
|
Jim,
This was just one of the many (annoying) features I have uncoverd with FC9.
So many wonderful and amazing features that I finally, gleefully, removed
FC9 this evening and I am installing SuSE on my webserver (home network).
In addition to the gdm vs kde issue (I much prefer kde myself), the Fedora
folks took away the different desktop managers (icewm, fvwm, twm, mwf),
screwed the pooch by removing/reducing the functionality of many of the
admin tools (CUPS, Samba, NFS Client/Server). I just finally got tired of
being disappointed and have gone back to a distro I have used before with
success. My previous FC use was FC2 and FC6. FC2 was great! FC6 was okay...
some changes made to how Samba shares are mounted was a PITA for a month or
so. But other than that, it was a good experieince. FC9 has been anything
but.
Maybe if they yank all the crap out of FC10, I will return. If not, then I
will stick with SuSE or migrate over to Solaris.
Joe |
|
Allen Kistler
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:17 am Post subject: Re: What is the latest kernel available for RedHat 9 ? |
|
|
seaPea wrote:
| Quote: | currently running 2.4.20-46.9.legacy
|
Since the Fedora Legacy Project no longer exists, nothing is officially
available. If you find anything at all, it's because someone hasn't
torn down their mirror yet.
Nevertheless, the latest I've been able to find is 2.4.20-46.9 for RH9.
If you really, really want something with a 2.4 kernel, I'd suggest
CentOS 3.9. |
|
Allen Kistler
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:37 pm Post subject: Re: No updates for Fedora 9? |
|
|
Allen Kistler wrote:
| Quote: | Jim Jaworski wrote:
Jesse Petre wrote:
Maybe there just haven't been any updates?
--
Jesse
At the minimum there should have already been a new release of the
kernel by now.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-September/msg00019.html
... of course, just try to *find* it ... although it does seem like
they've got most of the old packages signed with the new key. Trying to
find the new key is still a challenge, too. It should be at
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6DF2196F&op=index
Maybe next week.
|
I just checked. The new Fedora key is now on the PGP server. FWIW, I
got the key index from http://fedoraproject.org/keys under the heading
"Currently used keys." It's also eventually supposed to be in a new
fedora-release package signed with the old key.
The Fedora packages "released" yesterday still aren't available for
download. There was an announcement (dated yesterday, but didn't show
up in email until this morning) that they're still waiting for the
mirrors to sync all the old packages with their new signatures.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg00002.html |
|
